Helix ASIC array
An open accelerator rack. More compute increases potential output, but only if the energy and funding can support it.
- Balanced
- 100 CU / 60 EU
- Eco
- 60 CU / 28 EU
- Boost
- 150 CU / 110 EU
- Full output
- 0.02 sim sats / CU / s
ORBITAL WORKS / FIELD MANUAL 02
Compute needs energy. Production needs somewhere to go. Build a balanced circuit, inspect its bottlenecks and run an experiment.
Return to your stationThese are original game modules with deliberately simplified specifications. CU, EU and simulated sats are game units, not real hardware ratings or financial forecasts.
An open accelerator rack. More compute increases potential output, but only if the energy and funding can support it.
A solar-fed induction coil distributes energy through the hub. More cores raise the physical ceiling; the energy budget can still limit supply.
A three-column buffer catches simulated production. A full vault stops production until you archive a batch or add capacity.
The orange packets show simulated production moving from active arrays through the hub to a vault. Cyan packets show energy delivered from cores to arrays. Packet speed and density reflect the circuit’s utilization.
The $2/CU and $1/EU values are fixed game-balancing assumptions for a funding scenario. The budget is not a real quote and is not debited over time. Storage adds 10 EU of demand per enabled vault.
Lifetime output includes archived and currently stored simulated sats. Removing a vault keeps the recorded amount, but production remains blocked if available capacity is too small. A new module starts its own contribution counter at zero.
A projection of this game’s model using the draft saved on this device. It is not an estimate of Bitcoin mining profitability.
0–1,440 simulated minutes. The station does not run on this page.
Assumes no configuration changes. Storage capacity caps newly collected output. Archiving is a local action, never a payout.
Project trading fees would fund Bitcoin mining, and mined BTC would be distributed to eligible holders. That future system requires real providers, custody and settlement design, verifiable mining records, and an audited distribution mechanism.
| Approach | What would be funded | What must be verified |
|---|---|---|
| Hashrate rental | Contracted compute capacity pointed at a mining pool | Provider terms, delivered hashrate, pool fees and settlement |
| Hosted equipment | Hardware ownership plus hosting and electricity | Purchase cost, machine availability, maintenance, uptime and energy rates |
Real outcomes depend on Bitcoin network difficulty, total hashrate, BTC price, fees, uptime and pool luck. This prototype has no live network feed and does not repeat historical screenshot values as current data.
Phantom Connect shares a Solana public address after your click. This demo never requests signatures or transactions, and connection is not server authentication. Native BTC rewards remain a future integration.
No contract address, listed token, provider partnership or payout history is claimed.
No. They are local game counters with no monetary value. They cannot be claimed, transferred or withdrawn. The production coefficient is a toy rule, not a Bitcoin network calculation.
Boost raises both nominal compute and energy demand. If supply cannot keep up, the whole circuit is throttled. Eco can improve output per energy unit; compare modes using the module inspector.
It moves the vault’s local simulated counter into the archived counter, clearing room for more output. Lifetime output stays the same. No wallet, server or blockchain is involved.
Preview and save record a demo configuration and simulation snapshot only in this browser. Editing a saved project loads that snapshot paused. Reset clears the current draft and its counters; saved projects are preserved.
No. There is no live hashrate, difficulty, provider price or real production behind these counters. Use the scenario calculator to understand the game’s constraints, not to evaluate an investment.